I was thinking this morning about
the whole "write every day" thing so often said to new writers (at a
later date, I will write at length about why this is terrible advice), and was
thinking about how much of the culture of internet writing, particularly from
younger writers, is focused on word count. There is of course NaNoWriMo, but
there are also people who have "word wars" with each other to see who
can get the most words down in a given amount time, as well as people who
will set daily writing goals of a certain amount of words per day.
This
has never sat well with me, been my cup of tea, or been anywhere close to my
own writing method. That is, I just don't get it. I can see the use in
measuring a piece of writing to describe it--novels are one length, novellas
another, and so on--but not to actually write it. Unless it's
an essay, of course, and the students are trying estimate how much effort and
time they have to save right before the deadline to get it done. I myself can
easily get down 2500 words a day when doing academic writing. Creative writing,
wether that be prose or poetry, fiction or self-reflection, is something quite
different.
So
I was musing about why that is. I think it's because I conceive of creative
writing in different sized units, rather than as words. If I set a writing
goal, it will be to write a certain scene, edit a chapter, or produce a single
poem. These are all, of course, going to be variable lengths due to their
content. How many words should a chapter be? As many as it takes to tell that
chunk of the story. Poems are even more variable, from little haiku and
cinquains to things like "Howl" that
go on for pages. Some poems are short but complicated, like sestinas, which are
around 500 words at their biggest. Writing 500 words of prose is a cinch, but
sestinas take all kinds of planning and tweaking and reworking, so much that it
can take a whole day to write one.
There's
also dialogue. Dialogue tends to be short, with a lot of paragraph breaks and
empty space, so several pages worth of dialogue might be a third the word-count
of a more description heavy scene, yet convey just as much about the characters
or the world or the plot. And again, how many back-and-forth exchanges add up
to 600 words? Who cares? The conversation should end when the author thinks of
a good and natural transition, and if they haven't decided what happens after
said conversation, they can keep writing or step away to do some plotting and
come back to the scene another day.
I
was thinking all this because, once Recast Light is finished, I want to start three more WIPs, but all of them are very much in the air, in terms of what
kind of word count I'll be looking at. One, by my own design, will be minuscule,
and another will be pretty short if I can keep it from ballooning out of all
reason. The third is looking to be longer and longer and longer the more I
ruminate on it; I really wanted it to be one big book (the first draft of the
first chapter I wrote a while ago was 12,570 words, so... yeah), but now I'm
contemplating it being another trilogy, or, dare I say it, a series. But all
three are still in their embryonic stages, so I don't really care about length
right now, or at least I shouldn't. It's still hard, though, seeing everyone
talking about word counts, and when big community events like NaNo revolve
around such things. I want to be part of all that, but I also know that's not
the way I write. Such is life I suppose. I'll forge my own writerly path, for
as long as it takes me to get there.
No comments:
Post a Comment