I,
like most fantasy writers, think a lot about magic. I mean, a lot. I love thinking about different magical
systems and how they work, what their strengths and weaknesses are,
and how they can be employed to make the coolest story possible. Dark magic, light
magic, elemental magic, you name it. Magic cast with wands, or words, or
motions. Magic that comes from special creatures or from the hearts or minds of
humans. I love magic. What I don't love is when writers
have weird hang-ups about magic.
The
most notorious example of this is when a character says something along the
lines of "It's
not magic, it's bending/semblance/alchemy/etc." I assume this is an
attempt by the writers to make their magic system seem more interesting and
original, despite the fact that it's clearly magic with a different
name. I wouldn't mind this, except that by
coming out and stating "it's not magic", you're acknowledging that
your setting has the concept of magic. So... what exactly is the distinction
between "totally-not-magic" and, you know, regular old magic?